Mon05202013

Last update05:19:41 AM GMT

Font Size

Profile

Menu Style

Cpanel

Editorial

GPH-MNLF peace talks concluded in 1996

  • PDF

(March 1-7)

On March 1-2 representatives of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), Government of the Philippines (GPH), and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) represented by Indonesian Ambassador Rezlan Jenie, will meet in Bandung, Indonesia reportedly “to find ways to reach mutually-acceptable solutions to the remaining unresolved issues regarding the full implementation of the 1996 Final Peace Agreement (FPA).” While we support the full implementation of the GPH-MNLF FPA, but what we cannot understand, in fact we seriously question, is the wisdom of inputting of new issues that are outside the competence of the FPA and which are already in the official agenda of the GPH-MILF peace negotiation. The GPH-MNLF peace negotiation had officially ended September 2, 1996 when the two parties signed GPH-MNLF Final Peace Agreement, which means that no new agenda will be discussed except those related to the implementation. The OIC had already officially taken the position that Phase I of the FPA, which is the political aspect, had been fully implemented, and only Phase 2, which is the economic side, is still to be fully complied with. But Nur Misuari had never waited for this phase to be fully complied with when he accepted the chairmanship of the Southern Council for Peace and Development (SPCPD) and governorship of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM)? Why a playback to pre-1996 period when the FPA was under negotiation? These are nagging questions that a rationale mind has difficulty understanding!

Too early to say

  • PDF

(February 22-29)

In negotiation nothing is agreed until it is agreed and signed by the parties. This is a forewarning to those who are too overconfident in seeing the final breakthrough in the current GPH-MILF Peace Talks. Simple message system (SMS) or texts are circulating around that the government has already agreed to grant substate to the Moros in Mindanao, and more seriously, the Oman Times, quoting Mohagher Iqbal, chairperson of the MILF peace panel, reported that President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III had already agreed to that demand of the MILF. This report was bluntly denied by Iqbal, saying he was never interviewed by said newspaper nor has he ever made that claim. “It is unfair to the President in attributing this statement to him,” he said.

Misuari should find his right place in history

  • PDF

 

(February 15-21)

No doubt, MNLF Chairman Nur Misuari has a definite place in the history of Moro revolutionary struggle in Mindanao. He is the lead founder of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the main star in the popularization of the moniker “Moro” and the internationalization of the Moro issue. These are facts that we can easily concede. But a word of counsel, he cannot claim sole credit for these things. There were many men and women who shared this achievement --- many of whom were long dead and gone.

Kidnapping of foreigners

  • PDF

(February 8-14)

It is always bad to kidnap anybody, whether locals or foreigners. It is an unconscionable act that deserved to be denounced and condemned in the highest degree. But when foreigners are the victims, it becomes doubly difficult, because sometimes it is linked with the issue of international terrorism. It feeds into the appetite of those who want the conflict in Mindanao attached to the global war on terrorism.

Ninoy's great balancing act

  • PDF

(February 1-7)

President Benigno Aquino III is faced with a difficult job of balancing Philippines’ relations with the United States and China, the two superpowers now. But it appears this is cracking up and a tip to the side of the former is inevitable and underway. Perhaps, he realized – or is forced – that “when the elephants clash the ants hide away,” so to speak.